In December last year Clarence Valley Council made major changes to the structure and operation of its community advisory committees. Previously these committees provided the opportunity for more detailed interaction between community members and Council. The advice at advisory committee meetings was actually two-way - with council staff providing information in the specific area of the committee’s function and the community members responding. As the community members of these committees were volunteers with a range of expertise, experience and local knowledge, their input complemented the competencies of staff and councillors.
So what has changed? The number of advisory committees has been reduced from ten to four. As a result some areas are not adequately represented and there has been an amalgamation of responsibilities for each committee.
The Environment and Sustainability Advisory Committee (E&S Committee) is a good example of the problems with the new advisory committees.
This committee replaced the Biodiversity and the Climate Change Advisory Committees and covers a very extensive area. Its remit includes the following strategies – Environmental Management, Biodiversity, Bush Regeneration, Urban Tree Management, Solid Waste Management, Renewable Energy and Emissions Reduction. It also has responsibility for a Koala Plan of Management and Coastal Management Programs.
As meetings are now limited to two hours and there have only been two meetings this year, the range of areas to be covered indicates a lack of commitment by Council to either actually having effective community input or any commitment to the need for urgent action on very important environmental issues.
Another major change has been the staff composition on all these committees. Instead of the relevant manager, each committee meeting is now attended by the General Manager and the relevant Director at the next level of the bureaucracy. An obvious result of this has been strengthening control on what is actually discussed at these meetings with any input seen to be undesirable being squashed pronto.
It is increasingly obvious that Council is having advisory committees merely as a box-ticking exercise and that it has no genuine interest in community input.
- Leonie Blain