The Climate Council recently published a new report - "Weather gone wild: Climate change-fuelled extreme weather in 2018". It discusses extreme weather globally as well as in Australia.
There are four key findings.
The first is that the past four years have been the four hottest on record for global surface temperature; this continues a long-term warming trend. In 2018 the global average surface temperature was between 0.9 and 1.1 degrees celsius above temperatures in the late 19th century. In Australia last year the surface air temperature was 1.14 degrees celsius above the 1961-1990 average. It was the third hottest year on record. And 2018 was the warmest on record in the oceans, surpassing the previous record set in 2017.
The second finding is that climate change is increasing the frequency and/or severity of extreme weather both globally and in Australia. These extreme events are occurring in an atmosphere that contains more energy than it did 50 years ago. In 2018 extreme weather included extreme heat in many parts of the Australia, as well as severe bushfires in New South Wales, South Australia, Queensland, Victoria and Western Australia. While intense rainfall led to flooding in north Queensland, southwestern Western Australia and Hobart in Tasmania, southern Australia was in drought.
Events in other parts of the world included intense hurricanes in the United States southeast and record-breaking wildfires in California. Scandinavia suffered from extreme heat and Sweden had severe fires while drought in South Africa created a water supply crisis in Capetown.
The third finding is that the impacts of extreme weather last year have been both damaging and costly. Economic losses associated with weather-related disasters are estimated at US $215 billion globally. In 2018 in Australia insurance payouts (only a small part of the total costs of extreme weather) were $1.2 billion following major extreme weather events.
And the current eastern Australian drought is likely to cut the country's GDP growth in 2018-19 by 0.75% or up to $12.5 billion.
All of these impacts have resulted in the fourth finding which relates to our nation's lack of an effective climate policy.
The Climate Council points out that Australia's current climate policy is "an abject failure, with greenhouse gas pollution increasing over the past four years." What is needed is a policy which drives down emissions across all sectors - electricity, transport, industry, agriculture and land use. This should be directed to reducing emissions by 45-65% below 2005 levels by 2030 "as recommended by the Climate Change Authority in 2015".
Australia is doing so poorly currently that it will fall short of its much weaker 2030 target of a 26-28% reduction in greenhouse gas pollution below 2005 levels.
The message is very clear. Extreme weather events generated by climate change are increasing in both frequency and intensity. We need governments at all levels to accept this reality and to act urgently to cut drastically our greenhouse emissions.
Saturday, 9 February 2019
Wednesday, 30 January 2019
As our summers become increasingly hot for longer periods people will be looking to a range of strategies in order to stay cool in their homes and workplaces. One such strategy, already being widely used in other parts of the world including Germany, Austria and Singapore, is green or “living” roofs, roofs on which grasses, flowers or small shrubs are growing.
Such roofs have a long history. In Viking days turf-covered roofs in Scandinavia provided effective insulation from the cold. But these roofs are also effective in insulating buildings from heat.
Modern living roofscapes depend on a series of carefully designed layers which protect the roof and ensure that rainwater is filtered and drained and that the plants growing there can thrive.
The conventional roof serves a sole purpose – protecting the building and its inhabitants from the elements. In doing that it takes a beating from sun, wind, rain – and, in colder climates, snow. On a hot day temperatures on conventional roofs, particularly dark-coloured roofs, are much higher than the surrounding air. This makes it more difficult to cool the air in the building below. In addition the hot roof contributes to the urban heat island effect.
Up-front costs for green roofs are higher than for conventional roofs and some maintenance is required.
However, there are substantial benefits from these roofs. As the soil and vegetation act as living insulation, the building’s internal temperatures are moderated – so it is cooler in summer and warmer in winter. Less energy is needed for cooling or heating which means both greenhouse gas emissions and energy costs are lower. Other benefits include reduction of rainwater runoff, filtering of air pollution by the plants, support for biodiversity within an urban landscape and reducing the urban heat island effect.
A different roof strategy involves the development of cool roofs – roofs which use of reflection to send solar energy back into space. A variety of forms has been developed including light-coloured metal, shingles, tiles, coatings and membranes. In an increasingly warming world sending solar energy back into space rather than absorbing it is essential.
- Leonie Blain
This article was originally published in the VOICES FOR THE EARTH column in The Daily Examiner on January 21, 2019.
Wednesday, 23 January 2019
Research into the minerals exploration that has been underway in the Cangai area since 1917 has revealed numerous inadequacies across the entire monitoring and compliance system.
When the exploration company began reporting the finding of high grade ore, and the possibility of establishing an open-cut mine atop a mountain adjacent to the Mann River, local residents naturally became concerned.
A critical assessment of the company's licence application reinforced those concerns. Nowhere in that document is there any mention of the Mann River which, at Cangai, is little more than a kilometre away, and delivers some 70% of the Clarence River's total flow. Instead, in answer to the question asking what were the nearest waterways that might be impacted by the works, the proponent nominated Bobward and Smelter Creeks, two small ephemeral gullies that drain into the Mann.
Also, there is an assertion that only 40 square metres (5 metres by 8 metres) of bush would be cleared for each of the many drill sites - clearly an inadequate area for the safe operation of a drill rig, trucks and associated machinery.
An application to be included in the mandatory community consultation via the company's “contact us” portal, received no response whatsoever, forcing us to contact the regulatory authority, requesting an investigation be carried out.
Investigators from the NSW Resources Regulator subsequently undertook an on-site inspection, and a month later a media release informed the public that they had suspended all operations under the company’s two exploration licences.
The Regulator cited the reasons for the suspension as, “a lack of sediment and erosion controls; poor management of drill cuttings/waste materials; clearing and excavation works undertaken outside of approved limits; the drilling of bore holes without approval; and a failure to progressively rehabilitate in approved time frames”.
While it is gratifying to read that action is being taken, we have to ask would any inspection have occurred had members of the public not reported these breaches? The number of cases like this is evidence that self-regulation doesn't work; so it seems that, until regulatory authorities are adequately resourced, vigilance is the key.
- John Edwards
NOTE: The Mann River is major tributary of the Clarence River.
This article was originally published in the VOICES FOR THE EARTH column in The Daily Examiner on January 14, 2019.