AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENTS AND THE ADANI COAL MINE

Adani’s proposed Carmichael coal mine in Queensland’s Galilee Basin is frequently in the news for the very good reason that it is a very controversial development.

The Federal and Queensland Governments are both in favour of it because they claim it will have enormous economic benefits. 

Despite this governmental enthusiasm, community opposition continues to grow for a variety of reasons. Firstly there is the environmental impact that this mine will have both in its immediate area as well as globally.  

With a proposed annual extraction of 60 million tonnes per year it will be the largest coal mine in the world. So the carbon emissions generated from the coal’s extraction and combustion will have a very significant impact on the world’s climate. Those concerned about the accelerating rate of climate change argue that this mine will have an unacceptable impact on the world’s climate. They believe new coal mines should not be opened and that existing mines need to be systematically closed down unless they are essential for specific industries such as steel production.

This mine will also have an impact on the Great Barrier Reef.

The Great Barrier Reef (GBR), which runs for 2,300 km along the Queensland coast and covers an area of approximately 344,400 sq. km, is under threat from climate change and a variety of other impacts including port development and coal spills. As well as being an incredible natural wonder, the Reef is a major tourist attraction.  So it is a very significant earner for the Queensland and Australian economies as  more than two million people visit it each year generating earnings of more than $2 billion. .  Moreover, it is a major employer with more than 60,000 people employed in Reef tourism.

Last year there was a major bleaching event on the Reef.  This year there has been another.  Two such major events in consecutive years was formerly unprecedented. These events have highlighted how vulnerable coral reefs are to the warming seas produced by climate change. So concern about the Reef is another very strong reason for opposition to this mine and to the other mega-mines that are on the drawing board for the Galilee Basin.

Although some supporters claim up to 10,000 jobs would be generated by the mine, Adani’s consultants put the figure at less than 1,500 full time jobs. 

While the Queensland and Federal Governments talk up the job prospects from the Carmichael mine, they ignore the importance of the many thousands of tourist jobs reliant on a healthy Great Barrier Reef, a Reef that is currently under threat from the impacts of climate change.

Other claimed economic benefits are also questionable.  Given the world-wide move away from coal to renewables there is a strong likelihood (actually a certainty according to many analysts) that this project, which theoretically would have a life of 60 years, will become a stranded asset. That is one of the reasons Adani is having difficulty in sourcing investment capital.

What is really astounding is, given the likelihood that this will become a stranded asset, the Federal Government is considering giving Adani a loan of almost $1 billion of taxpayers’ money to build a rail line from the Galilee Basin to the coal port at Abbot Point 25 km north of Bowen.  The loan would be obtained from the $5 billion Northern Australia Infrastructure Fund (NAIF) a fund which has recently been criticised in relation to governance issues. 

QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT PUSHING FOR ADANI'S CARMICHAEL COAL MINE IN THE GALILEE BASIN

The proposed Carmichael coal mine in central Queensland’s Galilee Basin has recently been given a boost by the Queensland Government which has declared it ‘critical infrastructure’.  This designation means fast tracking the remaining project approvals and removing  the power of the community to challenge it in court as well as enabling the company to forcibly acquire land.

The last time this designation was given to a development in Queensland was in 2008 when parts of the South East Queensland Water Grid were declared critical infrastructure because water supplies in this heavily populated area were at critically low levels because of drought. There’s a great deal of difference between the critical infrastructure of a water supply grid and a massive coal mine!

The mine, proposed by Indian company Adani, gained most of the necessary state and federal approvals in 2014.  However, the project is controversial and has been subject to a number of court challenges.

Two concerns encouraging opponents to undertake court challenges are the threat the mine and its associated port developments (at Abbot Point, 25 km north of Bowen) pose to the Great Barrier Reef and to groundwater in the Basin. 

Another major concern is the carbon emissions this project will see released into the atmosphere at a time when the world should be drastically cutting its emissions. When peak production is reached, Adani expects to mine 60 million tonnes of coal per year.  Over its estimated 60 year life it expects 2.3 billion tonnes to be extracted. Whether the mine, if it goes ahead, will have a life of 60 years is problematic, given moves around the world to limit coal production, moves which are likely to become more influential in future years as concern rises about the necessity of limiting emissions to combat climate change.

There are other concerns in relation to Adani. These involve corruption, illegal activity, human rights abuses, tax evasion and environmental destruction

 (1. The Sydney Morning Herald 3 October 2015 -   Adani faces questions over conduct at home 

  2.  Times of India 13 September 2016  - Adani, Essar get DRI notice for overvaluing imports

  3.  The Sydney Morning Herald 5 September 2014 - Concerns at Barrier Reef contractor's humanitarian, environment record  )

While the unsuccessful court challenges may have slowed Adani’s start, another major problem has been its inability to obtain project funding - the result of a very successful lobbying campaign targeting major banks and other financial sources.

The Queensland Government’s recent encouragement stems from concerns about job losses in central Queensland following the general mining downturn in the last year or so.  The Government appears to believe the original company spiel of 10,000 jobs - even though Adani’s own economic expert recently put the job number at 1464.

The Queensland Mines Minister Anthony Lynham sees the project starting construction in mid  to late 2017.

The Queensland Government should be looking at the big picture.  This is not a time when governments should be encouraging the development of new coal mines - particularly  one as large as this.  Those opposing the mine are concerned that if all the coal from Carmichael was burned, it would register on a global scale - amounting to about 0.5% of the "budget" of carbon dioxide that can be emitted before the world tips past global warming of 2 degrees celsius.

As well as the climate change scenario, the  Government - anxious as it apparently is about jobs - should be considering  the 69,000 Barrier Reef tourism jobs that will be put at risk by this mine.

FALLOUT OVER CARMICHAEL MINE DECISION - Clarence Woman's Message to MP

The Australian Federal Government, through Greg Hunt MP, Minister for the Environment, recently gave federal approval for Adani's proposed Carmichael Coal Mine in the Galilee Basin in Central Queensland.  The Mackay Conservation Group engaged the Environmental Defenders Office (EDO) to challenge the approval in court.

The court overturned the Minister's decision because it failed to take into account two Approved Conservation Advices for two nationally threatened species that will be significantly impacted by the mine – the Yakka Skink and the Ornamental Snake.

TheMackay Conservation Group also had concerns about the carbon emissions from the burning of the coal from the massive mine and the impact of those emissions on the World Heritage listed Great Barrier Reef as well as Adani's poor environmental history.

Both Prime Minister Abbott and Attorney-General Brandis have expressed outrage at the decision and the capacity of conservationists to use the courts to prevent a development which they claim is in the national interest. In order to stop this from happening again they are legislating to prevent third party appeal rights except for those whose land is directly affected by a development.

Many community members and conservation groups are concerned about this response of the Abbott Government to the Carmichael decision. A Clarence Valley woman sent the following message to her federal Member of Parliament , Kevin Hogan (Member for Page).  Hogan is a National and a member of the governing Federal Coalition.

MESSAGE  TO  KEVIN  HOGAN  MP 

I am appalled that the Government of which you are a part is planning to remove community rights to take action in the courts against proposals which threaten the health of the natural environment. 

The comments which have been made by the Prime Minister and the Attorney General in response to the court decision on the Carmichael Mine case are over the top and verging on the hysterical.  Those bringing the case WON it because the decision of the federal government was flawed.  The court decision was righting a wrong.  That's what the law is supposed to do and that's what the community expects it to do.

Stripping the rights of community members and community groups to protect the environment in the courts may be applauded by big business, miners and foreign companies but it is betraying the community and future generations.  Governments should be supporting orderly legal processes rather than seeking to pervert them.

Does this government exist to kowtow to big business - including foreign mining companies - or does it exist to govern for the people of this nation and their long-term future?

The health of the natural environment is important to ALL of us because we rely on it for services such as clean air and clean water.  It is also vital that we ensure that the environment stays healthy for future generations - for my children and grandchildren and for YOUR children and grandchildren as well.

You might care to consider your position in relation to gas-mining in your electorate.  Would you support the stripping of the rights of Northern Rivers community members such as the Grafton Loop of the Knitting Nannas from taking legal action - if they so desired - to prevent a gas-mining company from endangering the natural environment in our area ?

The Government's proposed draconian legislation will have very wide ramifications - many of which will not be in the interests of local members such as yourself.  For that reason I urge you to speak out VERY strongly against this legislation.

Note: Kevin Hogan has stated that he opposes gas-mining in the Clarence electorate.  The writer of the message is presuming that Hogan would not support his constituents being denied the right to  take the miners to court.